Related guides:

Key takeaways

Understand the core concepts and terminology behind SOC vs SOC 2: Which Security Standard Should Your Business Adopt?.
Learn practical steps to apply the guidance and stay audit-ready.
See where SecureSlate can help centralize evidence, ownership, and ongoing compliance workflows.

In today’s digital landscape, where data breaches and cyber threats loom large, businesses of all sizes must prioritize cybersecurity. With the rise in remote work, cloud computing, and interconnected systems, safeguarding sensitive information has become more crucial than ever.

Two commonly referenced standards for ensuring the security of data and systems are SOC (System and Organization Controls) and SOC 2. But what exactly are these standards, and how do they differ? Let’s SecureSlate into the details to help you determine which one is best suited for your business.

Understanding SOC and SOC 2:

SOC:

SOC is a set of auditing standards developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). It focuses on controls related to financial reporting and encompasses a broad range of organizational activities.

There are three types of SOC reports: SOC 1, SOC 2, and SOC 3. While SOC 1 is specifically geared towards controls over financial reporting, SOC 2 and SOC 3 are more relevant for assessing the security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy of a service organization’s systems.

SOC 2:

SOC 2, on the other hand, is designed to evaluate the controls relevant to the security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy of a service organization’s systems.

It provides a framework for assessing and reporting on the effectiveness of these controls based on predefined criteria known as the Trust Services Criteria. These criteria include security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.

Key Differences:

Scope:

One of the primary differences between SOC and SOC 2 lies in their scope. SOC reports can cover a wide range of controls, including those related to financial reporting (SOC 1) and non-financial reporting (SOC 2 and SOC 3).

SOC 2, however, is specifically tailored to assess controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.

Focus on Trust Services Criteria:

While both SOC and SOC 2 are concerned with evaluating controls, SOC 2 places a greater emphasis on the Trust Services Criteria established by the AICPA.

These criteria serve as the foundation for assessing the effectiveness of controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. SOC reports may or may not address these criteria depending on the scope of the engagement.

Audience:

Another important distinction is the audience for which the reports are intended. SOC reports are typically intended for a broader audience, including stakeholders such as investors, regulators, and business partners.

SOC 2 reports, on the other hand, are often requested by customers and business partners as assurance of a service organization’s commitment to security and privacy.

Applicability:

When deciding between SOC and SOC 2, it’s essential to consider the specific needs and requirements of your business. If your organization is primarily concerned with financial reporting, SOC 1 may be the most appropriate choice.

However, if you’re a service organization that handles sensitive customer data or provides cloud-based services, SOC 2 is likely more relevant as it focuses on security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy controls.

Choosing the Right Standard:

1. Assess Your Needs:

Before deciding which standard to adopt, conduct a thorough assessment of your organization’s needs, risks, and regulatory requirements. Consider the type of data you handle, the sensitivity of that data, and the expectations of your customers and stakeholders.

2 Consult with Experts:

Seek guidance from cybersecurity professionals or compliance experts who can provide insights into the requirements of SOC and SOC 2. They can help you understand the implications of each standard and how they align with your business objectives.

3. Evaluate Cost and Resources:

Consider the cost and resources required to implement and maintain compliance with SOC or SOC 2. While SOC 2 may offer more robust security controls, it may also require a more significant investment in terms of time, personnel, and financial resources.

4. Engage with Customers and Partners:

If your decision to adopt SOC or SOC 2 is driven by customer or partner requests, engage with them early in the process. Understand their specific requirements and expectations to ensure that your compliance efforts align with their needs.

Conclusion:

Both SOC and SOC 2 are valuable frameworks for assessing and reporting on the controls implemented by service organizations. While SOC provides a broader scope of controls, SOC 2 offers a more focused approach to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.

When determining which standard to adopt, consider your organization’s specific needs, regulatory requirements, and the expectations of your customers and stakeholders.

By carefully evaluating these factors and seeking guidance from experts, you can make an informed decision that strengthens your cybersecurity posture and builds trust with your stakeholders.

Ready to Streamline Compliance?

Building a secure foundation for your startup is crucial, but navigating the complexities of achieving compliance can be a hassle, especially for a small teams.

SecureSlate offers a simpler solution:

Affordable: Expensive compliance software shouldn’t be the barrier. Our affordable plans start at just $259/month.
Focus on Your Business, Not Paperwork: Automate tedious tasks and free up your team to focus on innovation and growth.
Gain Confidence and Credibility: Our platform guides you through the process, ensuring you meet all essential requirements, giving you peace of mind.

Disclaimer (legal note)

SecureSlate is not a law firm, and this article does not constitute or contain legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. When determining your obligations and compliance with respect to relevant laws and regulations, you should consult a licensed attorney.