HITRUST and SOC 2: which framework fits your needs?

Photo: Unsplash

SOC 2 and HITRUST are both third-party assurance programs—but they serve different buyer expectations. SOC 2 is the default for many B2B SaaS buyers under AICPA Trust Services Criteria; HITRUST is the healthcare-industry shorthand for CSF-based certification validated by approved assessors. This guide helps you decide which framework fits—or whether you need both.

GIF via GIPHY

Related guides:

• HITRUST compliance readiness checklist
• HITRUST certification checklist
• HITRUST vs ISO 27001
• HITRUST collection

---

Key takeaways

• SOC 2 is broad B2B assurance; HITRUST is healthcare-focused CSF certification.
• Healthcare enterprises often ask for HITRUST; tech and finance buyers often ask for SOC 2.
• Control themes overlap heavily—evidence reuse is possible with disciplined mapping.
• HITRUST typically takes longer and costs more than a first SOC 2 Type II for similar-sized vendors.
• Choose based on contract pipeline, not framework popularity alone.

---

Different buyers, different asks

Buyer profile	Common request	Why
Health systems, payers, health-tech	HITRUST i1/r2 or CSF assessment	Harmonized healthcare control set
General enterprise SaaS	SOC 2 Type II	Standard vendor diligence
Mixed portfolio	Both	Separate procurement teams

A health-tech vendor selling to hospitals and tech companies frequently ends up with dual programs. Plan capacity before sales promises both reports in the same quarter.

---

What SOC 2 is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) reports on controls relevant to Trust Services Criteria:

• Security (required for virtually all reports)
• Availability, confidentiality, processing integrity, privacy (optional categories)

A Type I report addresses design at a point in time; Type II adds operating effectiveness over a period (often 6–12 months). CPA firms perform SOC 2 examinations and issue a SOC 2 report customers under NDA review.

SOC 2 is not healthcare-specific. Privacy criteria can help with PHI narratives, but it does not replace HIPAA legal duties or HITRUST certification language in healthcare contracts.

---

What HITRUST is

HITRUST provides the Common Security Framework (CSF) and certification validated by approved assessors through MyCSF. Assessment types (e1, i1, r2) define depth.

HITRUST explicitly harmonizes HIPAA, NIST, ISO, and other requirements—valuable when healthcare buyers want one assessment instead of mapping SOC 2 to their internal HIPAA checklist.

Deep dives: HITRUST complete guide, certification timeline.

---

Framework comparison

Dimension	SOC 2	HITRUST
Primary audience	Cross-industry B2B	Healthcare-heavy procurement
Control set	Trust Services Criteria + auditor criteria	HITRUST CSF (harmonized multi-regulatory)
Assessor	CPA firm (SOC practitioner)	HITRUST-approved assessor
Output	SOC 2 report (Type I/II)	HITRUST certification / validation outcome
Platform	Varies by firm (workpapers, portals)	MyCSF standard platform
Typical first timeline	~3–9 months for Type II path	~6–18+ months for i1/r2
PHI narrative	Via privacy criteria + customer mapping	Built into CSF healthcare context
Contract trigger	Security questionnaire / vendor risk	Explicit HITRUST clause

Neither is “easier”—they optimize for different reviewer mental models.

---

Control overlap and evidence reuse

Teams with SOC 2 often reuse evidence for HITRUST when they:

• Maintain a unified control register with mappings to both frameworks
• Run one access review calendar satisfying both programs
• Centralize logging, vulnerability, and change management proof
• Avoid duplicate policies with different names for the same requirement

Evidence type	SOC 2	HITRUST
IAM / MFA configs	✓	✓
Vulnerability scans	✓	✓
Incident tickets	✓	✓
Vendor diligence	✓	✓
MyCSF-specific narratives		✓
CSF rubric applicability docs		✓

Gap: HITRUST may require more granular CSF control responses and assessor sampling styles that differ from your CPA’s SOC workbook—budget time for mapping, not assume 100% reuse.

---

Which fits your needs

Choose SOC 2 first (or SOC 2 only) if:

• Revenue is primarily non-healthcare enterprise SaaS
• Buyers ask for “SOC 2 Type II” in security reviews
• You need faster third-party assurance for general market entry
• Healthcare is a small segment without HITRUST contract language

Choose HITRUST first (or HITRUST priority) if:

• Healthcare providers/payers dominate the pipeline
• Contracts specify HITRUST certification or i1/r2 assessment
• You want to reduce duplicate healthcare questionnaires
• Strategic moat is healthcare trust, not general tech trust

Choose both when:

• Mixed customer base is core strategy, not edge case
• You have staffing for GRC + evidence operations at scale
• Leadership accepts staggered timelines (SOC 2 Type II period + HITRUST validation)

For HIPAA legal duties alongside either framework, see HITRUST vs HIPAA.

---

Running both programs

Recommended sequencing for many health-tech vendors:

1. Stand up baseline security (IAM, logging, vendors, IR)—helps either path
2. SOC 2 Type II if broad market revenue is urgent (starts observation period)
3. HITRUST gap + MyCSF in parallel once scope and assessor are set
4. Unified evidence calendar to prevent teams from duplicating pulls

Risk	Mitigation
Two auditors, two requests	Single evidence repository + coordinator
Control drift	Change management notifies GRC on production changes
Sales over-promising	Publish internal “which report we have today” matrix

---

Unify evidence in SecureSlate

SecureSlate maps controls across frameworks, assigns owners, and maintains recurring evidence so SOC 2 and HITRUST programs reinforce each other instead of competing for engineering time.

Get started for free to centralize multi-framework compliance.

---

FAQ

Is HITRUST the same as SOC 2?

No. Different control libraries, assessors, platforms, and buyer expectations.

Does SOC 2 satisfy HITRUST customers?

Sometimes partially—many healthcare buyers still require HITRUST specifically.

Which is more expensive?

HITRUST certification at i1/r2 commonly costs more in total program effort than a first SOC 2 Type II—scope dependent.

Can one CPA do both?

SOC 2 uses CPA firms; HITRUST validation uses approved HITRUST assessors—often different organizations.

Type I SOC 2 vs HITRUST e1?

Both are lighter-weight, but they are not equivalent—buyers may not accept one for the other.

ISO 27001 instead?

See HITRUST vs ISO 27001 for a third comparison axis.

---

Disclaimer (legal note)

SecureSlate is not a law firm, and this article does not constitute or contain legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. When determining your obligations and compliance with respect to applicable laws and frameworks, you should consult a licensed attorney or qualified assessor.