FedRAMP authorization lives in documents assessors and Authorizing Officials trust. Know how the SSP, SAP, SAR, and POA&M fit together—and who owns each.
This guide covers: Core artifacts; Maintenance workflow.
GIF via GIPHY
Related: FedRAMP collection · how to write a watertight fedramp system security plan
Key takeaways
- SSP (System Security Plan): how controls are implemented.
- SAP (Security Assessment Plan): what will be tested and how.
- SAR (Security Assessment Report): assessor findings and results.
- POA&M: open weaknesses, milestones, and risk acceptance.
Core artifacts
SSP (System Security Plan): how controls are implemented.
SAP (Security Assessment Plan): what will be tested and how.
SAR (Security Assessment Report): assessor findings and results.
POA&M: open weaknesses, milestones, and risk acceptance.
Maintenance workflow
Update SSP when architecture or controls change.
Refresh POA&M monthly; close items with evidence.
Feed SAR gaps into engineering backlogs with owners.
Related guides
Get started with SecureSlate
SecureSlate helps teams automate evidence, control mapping, and audit-ready workflows for FedRAMP and related frameworks.
FAQ
How long does FedRAMP authorization take?
Timelines vary by baseline and maturity; many first-time Moderate efforts run roughly 12–24 months including remediation.
Can we reuse SOC 2 evidence for FedRAMP?
Often partially—cross-map controls in a GRC platform, then close FedRAMP-specific gaps (SSP depth, ConMon, federal inheritance).
Disclaimer (legal note)
General information only—not legal, audit, or attestation advice. Requirements depend on your contracts, system boundary, and assessor guidance.
Need compliance without the complexity?
SecureSlate automates ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, and more. Built for growing teams. See it in action.
No credit card required
