SecureSlate for Enterprise
One program across every entity, framework, and audit.
At this size the problem is rarely a missing tool. It is a governance, risk, and assurance function spread across separate platforms, retainers, and spreadsheets. SecureSlate consolidates it onto one control set and puts experienced practitioners on it, at a price agreed before the work starts.
Why now
Scale does not break the controls. It breaks the coordination.
Three things go wrong once one program has to answer for many parts of a business.
Every entity runs its own version of the program
A product line, an acquired company, and a regional subsidiary each carry different certifications on different tooling. Nobody can answer what the group's posture is without three people rebuilding the picture by hand.
The audit calendar never actually ends
A surveillance audit, a new certification, and a customer's own assessment land in overlapping windows. Run off separate evidence, each one restarts a collection cycle your team has already completed.
The stack costs more than the work it replaces
A GRC platform, a questionnaire tool, several scanners, and a consulting retainer, each priced separately and none of them accountable for the outcome. The line items grow faster than the program matures.
What changes
Unified governance, risk, compliance, and assurance.
What consolidation actually buys you once the program spans the whole business.
One control set, many entities and frameworks
Controls are implemented once and mapped across every framework and every part of the business that has to satisfy them, with scope kept separate where entities genuinely differ and rolled up where leadership needs one view.
Audits that run in parallel off one evidence base
Because evidence is collected continuously rather than per audit, a recertification and a new framework can proceed at the same time. Auditors work from the same current record instead of separate document requests.
Internal and third-party risk in one register
Risks, owners, treatment decisions, and vendor assessments live together and stay tied to the controls that address them, so third-party exposure is not tracked in a separate system from everything else.
Accountability, not just software
A dedicated compliance lead backed by experienced practitioners runs the operation with your team. You get a named owner for delivery rather than a platform licence and an implementation problem.
What is included
The operation, not just the platform.
Expert work, the platform, and the security tooling arrive together under one fixed price.
Every framework on one control set
Framework status, control health, test results, and inherent risk in a single view across the group, rather than one disconnected dashboard for each standard you hold.
Audits managed, not just prepared for
Audit windows, evidence packages, auditor questions, and findings tracked in one place. We coordinate with your auditors directly and keep overlapping engagements moving.
One risk register, internal and third party
Risks scored on likelihood and impact, tied to the controls that treat them, alongside vendor assessments, SOC report reviews, and remediation tracking for a growing supplier estate.
Your whole estate connected
Cloud accounts, identity providers, code hosts, HR systems, and device management feed evidence continuously, so control tests reflect what is true today rather than what was true at collection time.
People controls that hold at headcount
Onboarding and offboarding evidence, access reviews, policy acceptance, and security training run on a schedule across the organisation, so joiners and leavers do not surface as findings later.
Exposure monitoring across the estate
Code security, secrets detection, dependency and licence risk, external surface monitoring, and dark web exposure are part of the engagement rather than four more contracts to negotiate.
Frameworks
Carry several at once without running several programs.
Certifications overlap far more than they differ. We implement against the union of what you hold, then satisfy each standard from that one set. Custom and contractual standards map in the same way.
Testimonials
Programs that stopped being run by hand
What leaders say once compliance runs as an operation.
HIPAA isn’t something you do once. SecureSlate connected our tools, owners, and evidence so we can prove our program without the constant scramble, and we get 50+ hours a week back.
Edward CEO at HealthHaven
One dashboard for the whole ISO 27001 process. It’s intuitive, saves time, and brought everything together so we could certify without slowing operations.
Tristan CEO at Senbee A/S
We needed compliance that scaled with us. SecureSlate cut compliance costs while improving audit readiness. The ROI showed up immediately.
Michael CTO at Echonet
What usually stalls this
The cost of the current arrangement is the part nobody totals up.
“We already have a GRC platform and a consulting firm.”
That is usually the case, and it is the thing worth pricing. Add the platform licence, the questionnaire tool, the scanners, and the retainer together, then compare. Elfie consolidated off Vanta and cut platform cost by about 70 percent while gaining close to 5x more included features.
“Our environment is too complex for an outside team.”
Complexity is the reason to have practitioners on it rather than a licence. We work inside your systems with your security team, scope controls per entity where the business genuinely differs, and roll everything up to one view for leadership.
“We need accountability, not another vendor.”
You get a named compliance lead who owns delivery, joins your channels, and answers your auditors directly, backed by practitioners with SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, and HIPAA experience. Fixed pricing means our incentive is finishing, not billing hours.
“Switching mid-cycle would put a certification at risk.”
Which is why we do not cut over blind. Controls, policies, and historical evidence migrate first and run in parallel with your current tooling, and we time the transition around your audit calendar rather than a renewal date.
FAQs
What security and GRC leaders ask first.
Yes. Controls, evidence, and audits can be scoped per entity or product where the business genuinely differs, while still rolling up into one view of group posture. This is also how we handle an acquisition that arrives with its own program and tooling.
Your team keeps ownership and the decisions that require internal judgment. We take the recurring operational load, which is evidence collection, access reviews, vendor assessments, policy upkeep, auditor coordination, and audit preparation. In practice we function as additional capacity that already knows the frameworks.
Yes. Bring your existing controls, policies, and any internal or contractual standard you are held to. We map what you already operate to the frameworks you certify against, so you are not forced to abandon a control library that works.
ISO 42001 is one of the frameworks we deliver, and it maps against the controls you already run for SOC 2 and ISO 27001 rather than starting a separate program. If AI systems are in scope for you, raise it on the first call so it is built into the roadmap from the start.
Yes. Because evidence is collected continuously rather than per engagement, overlapping audits work from the same current record. We coordinate with each auditor directly, and we can tell you what to expect from the firms we work with regularly.
Fixed, agreed before work starts, covering the platform, the expert work, and the security scanning together. No hourly billing and no per-framework surcharge. Scope changes are priced up front rather than appearing on a later invoice.
We expect the same diligence we help you run on your vendors. Our security page sets out how we handle your data, and we will complete your security review and questionnaire like any other supplier before you commit to anything.
Put a number on the current arrangement
Bring your frameworks, entities, tooling, and audit calendar. We will map what consolidating onto one program would actually change, including where it would not be worth it.
